[敵を知り己を知れ] -海外掲示板・記事に降臨しよう-

Many Australians feel the prime minister is putting down a "with us or against us" line.
23 Feb 2015 10:11 GMT
http://www.aljazeera.com/blogs/asia/2015/02/alarm-abbott-view-islam-150223084146073.html

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Andrew Thomas
Sydney Correspondent

In his speech on countering violent extremism last week, US President Barack Obama drew a clear distinction between people who practice Islam - and those who "pervert" it.
Individuals are responsible for atrocities, Obama said, not religions.
"We have to make sure... that we do not stigmatise entire communities."
There were no such conciliatory lines from Australia’s prime minister in his speech on national security on Monday.
Instead there was this from Tony Abbott: "I’ve often heard Western leaders describe Islam as a 'religion of peace' I wish more Muslim leaders would say that more often, and mean it."
The implication was that not enough Muslim leaders describe Islam as peaceful, and that some of those who do don’t really mean it.
The line – and Abbott’s broader rhetoric – has alarmed many who feel the prime minister is putting down a "with us or against us" line; alienating the very people he most needs help from in his country’s fight against terrorism.
Lydia Shelly, a Muslim advocate and lawyer who Al Jazeera spoke with on Monday, described it as "dog-whistle politics". Struggling in opinion polls, she says, Abbott has jumped on national security – and the implied threat of some Muslims to it – as an issue he thinks non-Muslim voters will rally behind.
Even before Monday’s speech, the prime minister was being criticised by Muslim leaders for being divisive. More than 100 people and groups put their names to a petition last week, condemning the “targeting of Muslims through [existing] abominable 'anti-terror' laws”.
More anti-terror laws are likely to come as a result of Monday’s speech. Dual-nationals could see their Australian citizenship stripped from them; others "involved in terrorism" could lose the "privileges" of citizenship – including welfare payments and consular support abroad.
Some, though, feel Muslims with no connection to terrorism will be caught up in the trawl.
Abbott unapologetic
The prime minister is unapologetic for measures he says are necessary to keep Australia safe. In his speech, he fleshed out why: the context of a growing ‘terror threat’ in Australia.
Tony Abbott revealed his security agencies were currently working on 400 "high-priority counter-terrorism investigations" - more than double the number of a year ago. 110 Australians, he said, have travelled to Iraq and Syria to fight with ISIL – and those that returned to Australia would pose a big threat. There were, the prime minister said, likely to be more attacks by individuals like that on a Sydney cafe in December.
"Today’s terrorism requires little more than a camera-phone, a knife and a victim," he said.
The implication throughout the speech, though, was that one other ingredient was needed – inspiration from a (Muslim) ‘hate-preacher’ or from the rhetoric and ideology of the “Islamist death-cult” – Abbott’s name for ISIL.
Australia’s prime minister and the country’s most senior Muslim, the Grand Mufti Ibrahim Abu Mohammed, are already involved in a public spat; the latter said in an interview last week that he’d voted for Abbott in the past, but now regretted it. The prime minister should "work in any field other than politics" the Grand Mufti said.
Monday’s speech is unlikely to do much to repair the rift.
-------------------------
[jamawns' comment]
-------------------------
It is obvious that Islamic revolution is necessary. Muslim leaders must play the role for world peaces without religious discrimination.
ISIL must be destroyed by world Islamic Nations if Muslims are proud of their religion and prophet.
Muslim must aware that world citizens with natural feeling have persistently dared to refrain from criticizing 'Muslims'.
Can Muslims take responsibilities to make stable peace with their own collective security ability?
-------------------------
While non-Muslim addressed that ISIL must be destroyed, Muslim used to only say 'I am not relevant to ISIL.'
World has already agreeded with that ISIL is not Muslim, ISIL is not Islam, and ISIL is ISIL.
As a fact, ISIL only obey Islamic law but never obey international law.
Therefore, Muslims who know Islamic law can destroy ISIL by taking a lead of international society.
In the view point of international collective security, Muslims must show their attitude that 'ISIL must be destroyed' rather than 'I am not relevant to ISIL.'
The issue is not just a terrorism but a governance. Islamic religious revolution is necessary soon or later in order to establish Middle East stable peace of moderation and value pluralism. Jordan can govern middle east moderately, while turkey has Kurdish issue yet. Jordan King is offspring of Mohamed so he can be over 'I am Karif' among extremists. He has rightly governed his land without bearing terrorists since the war against Israel.
U.S. and EU governance, new Iraq gov. governance and ISIL governance never work in the Middle east toward stable peace, because U.S. has idea that enemy's enemy is ally, EU has idea that separation governance, new Iraq gov. kills Sunni by Shia, and ISIL extremely stays crazy.
-------------------------------------
A:How many suns does the Earth have?
B: Only one sun in my hillside.
C: Only one sun in my seashore.
A: I agree B and C. I also have one sun. Maybe the same sun.

A:How many gods does the world have?
B: Only one god in my hillside.
C: Only one god in my seashore.
A: I agree B and C. I also have one god. Maybe the same GOD.
-------------------------
Jewish and Muslim as well as Christian have claimed the throne as the true heir to the throne, so called inheritance dispute.
Truth is that each of them are equally the son of the only God of universe respectively.
Jewish prays the only God of universe called Jehovah through old testament.
Muslims prays only God of universe called Allah through Koran.
Christian prays Jesus, son of the only God of universe called Creator through old and new testament.
All of them have already agreed that the God is the only God of universe, meaning they have believed in the same God.